DNP 830 Assignments Reflective Journal
DNP 830 Assignments Reflective Journal
In your journal, reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained in this course and address a variable combination of the following: new practice approaches, intraprofessional collaboration, health care delivery and clinical systems, ethical considerations in health care, population health concerns, the role of technology in improving health care outcomes, health policy, leadership and economic models, or health disparities. Outline what you have discovered about your professional practice and the personal strengths and weaknesses that have surfaced. What additional resources and abilities could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes? Finally, how did you meet the competencies aligned to this course?Learners are required to maintain a reflective journal integrating leadership and inquiry into current practice.
Additional information regarding your reflective journal is found in the DC Network.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Submit your reflective journal both to the instructor and in the Typhon Tracking System under the corresponding course section. Failure to submit your journal in both the classroom and Typhon systems may result in a grade of Incomplete for the course.
A reflective journal is an account of your work in progress, but more essentially an opportunity for reflection on the learning experience. It should provide you with a means of engaging critically and analytically with module content.
What does a reflective journal look like?
There is no right or wrong way of presenting your journal, as this should take account of personal experience, preferred learning style and your independent research focus. Some journals are electronic (more like video or written blogs), and some take a diary form with visual & written material cut and pasted (literally) into ‘scrapbooks’.
ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 830 Assignments Reflective Journal
You should however:
Write in the first person. Be mindful that this journal is a public document and therefore it is important to consider the reader as you write. They were not with you on this learning journey so some context is important. Content is more important than presentation. Process & immediacy are the key words.
Your journal will be enhanced by evidence of:
Progression through a learning journey. Evaluation of new approaches experienced in the period of independent study. Teasing out assumptions underpinning practice. Critical evaluation of your own practice. Analysis of key or ‘critical’ moments from independent study, whether positive or negative, and what was learnt from them.Sensitivity to relationships with other members of the group. Taking a position and making an argument from your learning experience. Relevant reading. New understandings made from: reading, planning and or delivery, collaborative activities, the exam, the viva, and the questioning of previous assumptions.
How will your reflective journal be assessed?
Ask yourself is there evidence of:
Effective organisation and presentation of material and or evidence. Academic reading used in a relevant way to inform, support and or shape your reflections. Critical engagement with, rather than description of, the creation of your ideas, or of the term’s work; your own process; and the process of others. Evaluation of the limitations/potential of the work undertaken.Immediacy – did you reflect every time you met for discussions/rehearsals; or after each seminar?The 17-point scale criteria will broadly apply.
A very good journal will be analytical rather than descriptive; selective rather than comprehensive; based in evidence and references to wider reading; critical and cautious in the claims made; personal but not rhetorical.