This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

2.3:        Develop leadership skills to collaborate on interprofessional teams in the provision of evidence-based, patient-centered care.

5.2:     Apply professional, ethical, and regulatory standards of practice in the provision of safe, effective health care.

One way informatics can be especially valuable is in capturing data to inspire improvements and quality change in practice. The

Assignment Electronic Health Implementation

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) collects data related to adverse events and safety concerns. If you are working within a practice setting to implement a new electronic health record (EHR) system, this is just one of the many considerations your team would need to plan for during the rollout process.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, address the following questions related to the advanced registered nurse’s role during this type of scenario:

1. What key information would be needed in the database that would allow you to track opportunities for care improvement?
2. What role does informatics play in the ability to capture this data?

ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Electronic Health Implementation

The informatics plays a vital role in capturing the data by enabling a means of exchanging important healthcare data between the patients and healthcare providers to ensure positive health outcomes (Mehta & Pandit, 2018). The shared information within the interdisciplinary team ensures collaboration in healthcare provision. Further, informatics also ensures that patients are engaged in their care through joint decision-making. Moreover, informatics also plays a role in reduction of errors while utilizing the data collected by ensuring the establishment of standards of information to direct the understanding of every data category and its possible implication in healthcare.

1. Which systems and staff members would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team?
2. What professional, ethical, and regulatory standards must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system?
3. How would the EHR team ensure that all order sets are part of the new record?
4. How would you communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan?
5. What measures and steps would you take to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective?
6. What leadership skills and theories would facilitate collaboration with the interprofessional team and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care?

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-514 NUR-514-O502 Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper 210.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 70.0%
Key Information Needed in the Database to Track Opportunities for Care Improvement 10.0% A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is not included. A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is present. A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Role Informatics Plays in the Ability to Capture This Data 10.0% A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is not included. A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is present. A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

The Systems and Staff Members that Would Need to Be Involved in the Design and Implementation Process and Team 10.0% A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is not included. A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is present. A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards That Must Be Incorporated Into the Design and Implementation of the System (5.2) 10.0% A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is not included. A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is present. A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

How the EHR Team Would Ensure That All Order Sets Are Part of the New Record 5.0% A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is not included. A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is present. A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Communication of the Changes, Including Any Kind of Transition Plan 5.0% A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is not included. A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is present. A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Measures and Steps to Evaluate the Success of the EHR Implementation 5.0% A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is not included. A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is present. A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Leadership Skills, Theories, and Styles to Employ for Collaboration on Interprofessional Teams Participating in the Legislative Process and Providing Evidence-Based, Patient-Centered Care (2.3) 10.0% A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is not included. A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is present. A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.